|
Getting Back to Work after September 11 1 Independent
Practice, New York City and Larchmont, NY
I was born in Brooklyn and have lived and worked most of my life
in New York City. Because
I now live just outside the city, for days following the terrorist
attacks, I could not get into Manhattan to volunteer.
I felt helpless and guilty as my colleagues were working with
victims, their families, and rescue workers at Ground Zero.
I thought about how I could make a contribution to the
psychological recovery and well-being of at least some of those who have
been affected. I decided to
volunteer my services to a population I know well and one that would
probably not be offered services with respect to the terrorist attacks.
I called a number of my corporate clients, contacts who had
referred work to me, and law firms with whom I had worked, and offered
to conduct a debriefing group pro bono for anyone in their
company or firm. Many of my client companies are in industries that have
strong ties to those in the World Trade Center and downtown Manhattan,
such as finance, real estate, law, and insurance.
People in these companies and firms have close connections with
those companies whose offices were destroyed and lost people in the
attack. One person
told me that he and others in his company were on a conference call with
someone at Cantor Fitzgerald when the plane hit and the phone went dead.
The debriefing sessions were open to anyone who wanted to come.
As might be anticipated, more women than men and more support
staff than senior executives, brokers, or partners attended.
People were very appreciative that I had come to talk with them
and I felt better that I was doing something useful. Because
these firms had not lost anyone and did not have their buildings
destroyed or damaged, the people in them are not necessarily seen as
victims. Many of them,
however, are experiencing significant symptoms and work disruption. Workplace
Themes
In addition to the common reactions we have all witnessed and,
perhaps, experienced ourselves, several themes emerged in these sessions
that were specific to work environments.
Level of empathy.
A common concern was that the bosses or partners do not
understand what their employees are going through.
My sample is small, but it seems that upper level executives and
managers are better at using denial and displacement than their
supervisees. It was
reassuring to others, when senior level people or firm partners
expressed their own distress during the sessions.
It is important for people to know that those in charge
understand.
Distance from the disaster.
The closer the connection to the disaster, the more likely that
someone would have a stronger reaction.
Some people had, at one time, worked in the World Trade Center or
specifically for one of the companies that lost many people.
They echoed the sentiment, “It could have been me.”
In some cases, their former co-workers and friends were killed in
the attack and they were attending many memorial services.
Fear of being stigmatized.
Many people were self-conscious about their feelings and were
reluctant to reveal them to their co-workers or managers. A
few people straggled in toward the end,
wanting some help but not wanting to publicly participate in the
session.
Guilt.
Some people felt guilty because they were having difficulty
working but had lost no one close to them.
They did not feel entitled to have such problems.
In addition, they felt guilty because they were letting down the
company or their immediate boss by not working as effectively as they
previously had. A number of people did not come back to work for the
remainder of the first week. One
woman said that when her building across from Grand Central Station was
evacuated she just kept walking in her high heels until she reached her
home in Brooklyn about 10 miles away. Helping
organizations cope
1. A process for
people to access stress management and debriefing programs should be
established, either through an existing EAP or through external
consultants.
2. Senior level
people need to support and participate in the programs offered.
3. In order to
decrease concern about participating, the informational aspects of those
services offered to employees should be emphasized.
4. The privacy of
those who seek help needs to be protected.
For instance, procedures for signing up for meetings should not
require a public sign-up sheet. Organizational leaders need to demonstrate sensitive concern for their employees at all times. During times of crisis, it is vital to the well-being of their personnel and of their organizations. 1 This is a prepublication copy: Gindes, M. (2001, Nov/Dec) Getting back to Work after September 11. NYSPA Notebook , 13, 17, 33. Please do not quote or distribute without permission of the author. Marion Gindes, PhD can be reached at 16 North Chatsworth Avenue, Larchmont, NY 10538, 914-833-1944. email: mgindes@clinicians2consultants.com Biographical
Sketch Marion Gindes, Ph.D. is a licensed psychologist in independent practice in Manhattan and Westchester County. She provides consultation to individuals, businesses, and organizations on work-related issues, including discrimination, gender issues, sexual harassment, diversity, executive coaching, and conflict and stress. She has published many articles in professional journals and co-edited Social Intervention: A Behavioral Science Approach. She is a past President of the Division of Media Psychology of the American Psychological Association and has served on the Executive Board of the Westchester County Psychological Association. She is currently co-chair of the Membership Committee of the New York Women's Agenda and head of the Task Force on Consulting for APA's Division for Psychologists in Independent Practice. She also coaches professionals to become business consultants through Clinicians2Consultants, a virtual training company. Marion Gindes can be reached at mgindes@clinicians2consultants.com or 914-833-1944. |